Skip to main content

Smartsheet: an alternative to Microsoft Project

For years Microsoft Project dominated the market for project management software. It has a steep learning curve and is an expensive per seat cost. I was a technical writer for a small software company that used MS Project for the three project managers and myself. While I enjoyed learning about the science of project management from them in our meetings, I discovered that using the software was not that intuitive. I plugged in the tasks and timelines for several projects only to discover how challenging it was to have to refactor dates. It seemed to mess up the entire project such that I just stopped using it. It was more time consuming setting it up and refactoring it than just inputting status to show our progress.

It looks like a better option is SmartSheet which is used by many major companies. You can sign up for a free trial to get familiar with it. The more you can learn about tools to manage instructional design projects, the more likely you are to be considered for the team.

Take a look at SmartSheet when you have a chance. It's really cool that they have their own training courses with certifications and badges. I imagine you could earn these with your free trial and have this on your resume when your interviewing for your first ID job.



https://www.smartsheet.com/solutions/project-management





Comments

  1. Thanks for sharing! I, too, don't love MS Project and find it to be both over simplified and overly complicated at the same time. As we transition through the program and our careers, project management seems to be at the forefront of ID work. I wonder how we can relate principles of Web 2.0 to project management tools like SmartSheet? Badging is clearly one! I wonder if they have a community aspect to training, like LinkedIn Learning does? Or perhaps we might look at the team using the tool as a tiny PLN?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I use SmartSheet and I personally like it a lot! I'm unfamiliar with MS Project, but Smartsheet works well for my team. I have seen some of the webinars, but I have not done any of them. I completed a couple of Smartsheet LinkedIn Learning courses as part of my onboarding though, and using that definitely got me familiar enough to be confident in my usage.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Share your comments here

Popular posts from this blog

Easygenerator content authoring app

Here's another newer app that I just discovered. Maybe you already know about this one? Easygenerator sounds like its name. Like many apps it can convert PowerPoint slide decks to e-learning. https://www.easygenerator.com/en/features/powerpoint-import/ The thing with these content authoring apps is always the price. If you work on a team it's more likely your manager would approve of subscribing to some sort of app. It's not cheap, though. Take a look at the pricing below. Also, if you work independently either for a small business or as a contractor, the $1000 annual fee needs to be factored into the ROI of your projects. Do you think these prices are reasonable or a bit out of reach?

How much do apps matter in Instructional Design?

https://www.aura.com/learn/social-media-privacy-risks This week in my graduate course we discussed social media tools - Web 2.0 - that are useful in learning environments. My disclosure is that I typically don't use social media for personal use, and this makes it a bigger jump to think about using it for learning purposes. The irony is that I enrolled in this elective class because I am intrigued about using social media for learning environments.  The points I vacillate on are data security and time commitment. With data security I would need to ensure that learners' data, user profiles, etc. are protected. This isn't the same thing if it's higher education and the university is using an LMS. FERPA and a contract protect student data and how it's used. With free social media apps there's more risk to a learner's content. I'm still exploring these tools to determine if there are settings to protects our learner's identities and content. One thing th